So as artist I am highly offended by the fact these students and alumni are against the artistic expression of Moore. Art is what you make of it, it should be a free form of expression from within the artist. I also truly believe that not all art is not beautiful or has a pleasing aesthetics. In the past we had Dadaism which was seen as anti-art however, I believe it was still art wether it was provocative, disturbing or doesn't conform to the usual convention of art. Art also can be appreciated despite its functions and physical properties. In the Defence of Moore viewers and audience of any art have to be mentally mature to appreciate the piece.